Everything You Need to Know about Painting Your House

Essay on There is No Escaping the Matrix - 1916 Words

There is No Escaping the Matrix In the video game world anything is possible, and if your player dies you can always play again. The videogame industry is exploding in the market place; its far from childs play and far from the days of pong. In the most recent issue of Entertainment Weekly (December 6, 2002) there is an article, Video Game Nation, discussing a new video game experience being touted as the wave of the future, The Real World meets The Matrix. In this virtual world called The Sims Online, people live in a virtual environment peopled by avatars created by thousands of other gamers. Neal Stephenson envisioned this future ten years prior with his release of Snow Crash. Stephenson describes a computer-generated†¦show more content†¦If you look closer at Agent Smiths statement, As soon as we started thinking for you, your world became our world. a sliver of truth comes out of it. If the thinking is left for someone or something are we not giving up our world in exchange for theirs? Is it possible that people are evolving into a machine loving species capable of finding our selves imprisoned by our own creations? In the movie The Matrix, Agent Smith, the computer-generated villain, expresses his views on The Matrix. He marvels at its beauty, its shear genius. The Matrix, he explains, went through some changes after some crops {humans} were lost when the humans failed to accept the perfect world where everyone was happy. Agent Smith goes on to explain that other Artificial beings believed we lacked the programming language to describe the perfect world. Agent Smith comes up with his own theory, that humans need pain and suffering in order to define their reality. So rather than create a perfect world the machines recreate a more real world; a world of suffering a Buddhist world, one that prevents the human mind from trying to wake up from. This is the world Neo grows up in, this Matrix world. He grows up in a machine world; his mind is a by-product of the machinery, therefore, making him the perfect candidate to be the chosenShow MoreRelatedPlatos The Republic: Analysis of the Chapter Entitled Allegory of the Cave588 Words   |  3 Pagesnew found freedom. In the 1999 film The Matrix, ideas that Plato presented in the â€Å"Allegory of the Cave† resurfaced as the story line of this film. In the film there are two worlds. A virtual reality and a true reality. Just as cave dwellers in the Allegory know of only one reality, the inhabitants of the virtual reality(the matrix) know of only one world, even though that world does not even truly exist. All the experiences a person has in the matrix are only a mental representation of what theyRead MoreThe Matrix: Technology Fears of a Dystopian World630 Words   |  3 PagesEven a mediocre movie has the ability to take the audience to another place, escaping the realities of their own life, even if for just a few short hours. Some movies are simply pure entertainment. And then, there are those movies that provoke conversation long after the film has been viewed. Despite the popularity of the recent films The Hunger Games and Divergence, the dystopian theme in film is not a new one. The Matrix shows a society where humans exist without any freedom. The film, not only entertainingRead MoreThe Allegory Of The Cave Essay975 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"The Allegory of the Cave†, and the renowned sci-fi movie â€Å"The Matrix.† Both works deal with escaping a false reality while unveiling a real one. In Plato’s â€Å"The Allegory of the Cave†, the escaped prisoner synonymous to the character Neo in â€Å"The Matrix†, exhibiting a shared theme behind both plots. Socrates suggest that with effort, all that is beautiful and right can become visible or apparent to the prisoner, where as in The Matrix, Neo is called to a similar fate, under the premise that the zenithRead MoreComparing the Views of Plato, Descartes, and the Themes of The Matrix995 Words   |  4 PagesPlato, Descartes and the Matrix Every philosopher seems to be more concerned with constitutes reality than any other factor. When different ones were discussing the law, mathematics, science they were still trying to nail down reality to their satisfaction and determine what it is and whether it truly exists the way people have always believe that it does. Descartes for example was a noted mathematician who is still studied to this day. All three snippets are looking at whether reality, actualRead MoreThe Matrix: Fear of Technology in a Dystopian World1158 Words   |  5 PagesThe Matrix: Fear of Technology in a Dystopian World Millions of people flock to the movie theater year after year on a quest to be entertained. Even a mediocre movie has the ability to take the audience to another place, escaping the realities of their own life, if only for a mere two hours. Some movies are simply pure entertainment. And then, there are those movies that provoke conversation long after the film has been viewed. Dystopian themes are not new, and have historically provided a templateRead MoreMusic And Its Effects On Children1352 Words   |  6 Pageswill affect their behavior. Children have to learn some way and see the world for what is, so why not let someone paint that image through a set of lyrics? It harmless and has no effects on people, its just words and sound. The sound of music is a matrix itself. Everyone has his or her own certain idea of how music should sound and can be very judgmental of what should and should not be made. We affect the sound of music as a whole, because those who are not willing to try or accept new and differentRead MoreThe Matrix, Directed By The Wachowski Brothers1533 Words   |  7 Pages The 1999 film ‘The Matrix’, directed by the Wachowski Brothers, tells the story of a computer-generated world in which humans are used as batteries to power the matrix’ systems. The film focuses on a small team of humans who are fighting against the matrix. There are several themes in this film and many of which are suggested through the ‘material body’. The material body is made up of four key elements- cinematography, mise-en-scà ¨ne, editing and soundtrack. These elements are crucial to the audience’sRead MoreEssay On Mans Search For Meaning1561 Words   |  7 Pagestoo difficult to accept. In order to find meaning in one’s life while suffering or experiencing a difficult situation, meaning is often found in illusions and false hoods, rather than in reality. Within Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl, The Matrix, and Allegory of the Cave by Plato, the reader witnesses individual characters that were unable to withstand the pain of the truth, and resort to altering their perception to live in a illusion in order to survive. On the path to discovering meaningRead MoreThe Connection Between Senses and Reality in The Matrix, Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy and Plato’s The Republic562 Words   |  2 PagesThe popular movie The Matrix, Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy and Plato’s The Republic have more in common than you would think at quick glance. They all examine the theory that our world is an illusion and question the connection between our senses and reality. The clearest similarity between these works is t he doubt of the reality of our world and questioning the reliability of our senses. Descartes proposes that we are dreaming and everything we experience is just an illusion. PlatoRead MoreA reflection of Odysseus and Modern Day Heroes The Odyssey by Homer1717 Words   |  7 PagesCaptain Jack Sparrow, James Bond, and Spiderman. Accordingly, the heroic qualities of Odysseus can be still be seen in todays modern day fictional heroes. Odysseuss superior strength and athleticism resembles to modern day character of Neo in The Matrix. In the Odyssey, Penelope told the suitors that she would marry who ever was able to string Odysseuss old bow and shoot it through twelve axe heads. Many suitors attempted this task but not a single one was even strong enough to string the bow. However

Chickens Essay Example For Students

Chickens Essay Questions1.Ethically as we Americans have defined is not on the minds of these executives of the cigarette firms. Our society has made it ethically and legally wrong to sell cigarettes to a minor. These companies located in the United States adhere to the laws and ethical issues within our borders, so what is the difference when they practice these unethical business transactions in smaller countries. These smaller, less developed countries do not have the technology and understanding to disallow the sale of cigarettes to minors. These gigantic tobacco companies should follow the same practices in smaller countries as they do in their home country the U.S. 2.Yes, I believe giving free sample packs of cigarettes to minors in foreign countries to be some form of bribery. You need to ask yourself why are the free samples being distributed? Merely to get younger generations hooked, so these companies have a long time consumer. Bribery doesnt always have to consist of money; this is a form of brainwashing in my opinion. By getting the younger, less intelligent population hooked early on cigarettes, these companies have opened up a new market to extend their own profits. Im sure the tobacco companies realize that a couple thousand free sample now is fine compared to the long term spending they will encounter from the individuals that get hooked. 3.No, they are not acting with social responsibility. Why or how could this be any bit of an ethical decision by the executives of the tobacco companies? These companies should believe and follow its moral set in the country it belongs and carry them into every business transaction that they make, whether it be in New York City or Mongolia. It is too bad that as a capitalistic society we lower ourselves below ethical lines just to earn a buck or two!4.Yes, I believe this problem can be addressed and solved through education. The United States has introduced the Foreign Corrupt Act Policy to disallow any bribery in foreign Markets whether or not the country allows it, it is merely enough that you belong to The U.S. that you follow their ethically values wherever your business may go. We need to educate these countries and their youth about the bad problems derived from smoking before they get hooked. We werent aware of the initial effects smoking had on us, and this allowed it to be s ocially acceptable. If we had been made aware of all the issues from the get go, maybe smoking would not be tolerated at all in our country. I feel this is the only way to help other countries fight the war against money hungry tobacco companies. This would be a hard task, but slowly and surely it can only help! SummaryThe main issue of this case is whether or not is an ethical business practice to sell cigarettes to minors in other foreign countries. The main blockade is all the money that the gigantic tobacco firms have compared to the very little money and knowledge the foreign countries have to fight against this issue. If you are to specifically look at Argentina and realize that they get Twenty-two percent of their taxes from cigarette revenue, now what country wants to give up that kind of money coming in?Solving this problem is going to be very costly and time consuming. Everyone, meaning lesser-developed countries, has to play catch to America. What we know and understand a bout cigarettes and the ways of the tobacco countries allow us to make decisions in an ethical manner, while these money hungry little countries will turn there heads to ensure money for their own economic growth.

Rh Bills Implication Essay Example

Rh Bills Implication Essay RH Bill Will Destroy the Filipino Family Posted on 19 December 2012 by Truthsayer 1 By Dennis Yu1 1. Dissecting the RH Bill a. The problem being addressed by the Bill The latest version of the RH Bill2 does not refer to any specific problem related to demography. It does not mention at all the typical justification of population-control-to-eradicate-poverty. This version3 refers to reproductive health per se. The Philippines, according to this Bill, needs a law on reproductive health. By implication, it says that the Philippines does not have any law that addresses the reproductive health needs, an implication that is incorrect since there are already laws that address many of the provisions of the Bill. 4 The Bill seeks to address the reproductive rights of everyone. In Section 2, it affirms that there is such a thing as reproductive right and that such right is part of the human rights. It cites the international agreements where the Philippines is a signatory implying that the Philippines has to comply with its promises. What is not written in the Bill, though, is that the Philippines signed these agreements as the condition for receiving loans from international financial institutions. 5 Paradoxically, however, the current head of International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, says that the â€Å"Philippines is in the enviable position of having a young population and a fast-growing work force, whereas most advanced countries and even some emerging markets in Asia have populations that are aging rapidly. †6 b. The objective of the Bill The main objective of the Bill is to give everyone of his/her reproductive rights. We will write a custom essay sample on Rh Bills Implication specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Rh Bills Implication specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Rh Bills Implication specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In its words, it gives the Filipinos a â€Å"safe and satisfying sex life†7 and the â€Å"possibility of having pleasurable and safe sexual experiences. †8 c. The means to be employed There are basically two means to achieve this objective: distribution of contraceptives and sex education. Put another way: educating the people how to use contraceptives. This may sound too simplistic, but at the end of the day, that is what the Bill is trying to do. 2. Internal contradictions of the Bill The bill looks harmless and seems pro-women. But a careful reading of the bill brings several internal contradictions which include the bill’s sections related to the prevention of teen pregnancies, the right to life of the unborn and post-abortion care. I will be commenting these three areas as I go through the next three sections of the paper: the damaging effects of the bill on (1) the person and (2) on the family, and the (3) role of the State. 3. The Bill’s damaging effects on the person a. Contraception i. The health risks of contraception The pharmaceutical companies emphasize the benefits of their product and hide the negative effects. The Bill speaks of punishing any healthcare personnel who withholds information on the RH. 9 But does the Bill require aggressive and complete transparency as regards the negative effects of contraceptives? The user should know the possible abortive effect of some contraceptives: that she is possibly killing her own child. There should be a warning in big bold letters just like the health warning in the cigarettes: SMOKING KILLS. To cite just one of the many health risks: â€Å"Oral contraceptive use gt; 1 year was associated with a 2. -fold increased risk for triple-negative breast cancer†. 10 ii. Contraceptive mentality For the purposes of this paper, it is sufficient to look at Singapore (which has one of the lowest fertility rate in the world at 0. 78). Singapore has been giving incentives for some decades now for couples to have more babies. Lee Kwan Yew, who was the author of the population control in Singapore, said that â€Å"in the future we will have to depend on im migrants to make up our numbers, for without them Singapore will face the prospect of a shrinking workforce and a stagnant economy. 11 In an interview with a business leader, he said that the Philippines has to worry about the below-replacement fertility rate12 when it eventually comes in a few decades or so. For now, according to him, the more urgent problem is to reduce the population growth. In Singapore, the fertility rate dropped steadily until it reached 2. 1 in the 1970s. But it did not stop at 2. 1. Here is summary of Singapore’s fertility rate13: It seems irreversible according to Singapore’s experience. It took them a short time to â€Å"brainwash† the people for the fertility rate to fall. It is now taking them longer, if at all, to re-educate the people about all the advantages (economic, social and psychological/emotional) of having a large family. iii. Promiscuity What, in fact, the RH does, in the U. S. experience, is to make the girls promiscuous. Take note that the RH does not limit the contraceptives to married people. They are to be given to everyone. When you give contraceptives, the message is clear: have a â€Å"satisfying sex life†14. You can have a â€Å"safe sex†. But that is a false promise! The statistics on abortion show that contraceptives fail, and fail a lot! Its failure has killed millions of human beings, some 1. million in 2007 in the U. S. 15 I do not know if the Filipino mothers have understood clearly that RH brings with it â€Å"casual sex† for their daughters. In the U. S. , for the period 2006-2010, 4. 4 million female teenagers engaged in pre-marital sex. 16 I don’t know if the Filipino mothers can think beyond the short-sightedness of the pro-RH people. This evil ideology should not be imposed on the Filipino nation. iv. Teen pregnancies The Bill wants the Filipinos to have a â€Å"satisfying sex life†17 and at the same time it intends to prevent teen pregnancies. 18 One has to be completely blind not to realize the contradiction of these two terms. Sex education will teach the teenagers on the pleasures of sex and expect him/her to control his/her urges at the same time. Why does the MTRCB19 require â€Å"Parental Guidance† in watching some movies? Why does the State grant the right of suffrage only to those 18 and above? Why are minors not allowed to enter into any legal contract or own guns? It seems there is a difference between an adult and a minor! The minors do not have yet sufficient capacity to make serious decisions. And yet they are given â€Å"reproductive right†! They can decide to have or not to have another human being, and yet they cannot vote in the elections! True, it is nature that endowed them their biological capacity to reproduce. But it is also true that they were given hands and the capacity to kill other people at any age. When my friend was 7, he almost pulled the trigger of the revolver of his dad thinking that it was a toy gun. And we say: his dad should have been more careful with his gun, right? Similarly, should we not be more careful in teaching the teenagers about sex? The RH will not prevent teen pregnancies. Using contraceptives is not that easy. There are so many steps to follow to be able to use them successfully. The chances of pregnancy, therefore, are very high. In the U. S. , in 2002, there were 10 million women who said that they got pregnant when they were teenagers (aged 15-19). 20 b. Abortion i. Abortion is part of the contraceptive mentality Due to the contraceptive mentality, pregnancy (= baby) is seen as a disease that has to be avoided at all cost. Contraceptives, according to the Bill, are to be treated as essential medicine21 to cure the â€Å"sickness† of pregnancy. The next step, then, is abortion. To the contraceptive peddlers who say that contraceptive has nothing to do with abortion, and, in fact, is meant to reduce abortion, the statistical data of the Western countries belie their claims. In Spain there were 112,138 abortions in 2007. Here is the summary of abortions in Spain from 1992-200722: Abortions have doubled in the last 10 years. Where is the efficiency of contraceptives in reducing abortions? Where is the sex education that will teach the girls to prevent pregnancy? ii. Right to life of the unborn The Bill repeatedly â€Å"protects† the life of the unborn by affirming that abortifacient23 is illegal, that the penal code on abortion is not repealed24, that the mother and the unborn have equal rights25. It prohibits postcoital pills and emergency contraceptive pills. 6 But at the same time, it includes specifically the use of intra-uterine device (IUD)27, a device that prevents implantation and hence abortifacient. It also includes hormonal contraceptives that are at the same time abortifacient. As contraceptive, it inhibits the ovulation. As abortifacient (meaning, when the contraceptive function fails, the â€Å"back up† is abortive), it inhibit s the implantation of the fertilized ovum. 28 It seems that in the Senate debate last 19-XI-212, the senators refused to agree when life begins so as not to exclude IUD. They even put it on vote as if truths can be defined by popular democracy! Even if they were to unanimously vote affirming that â€Å"Rizal never existed†, that will not change the fact that Rizal did exist. ) Worse, the Bill implicitly acknowledges that, indeed, some contraceptives have abortive effects. Sec. 9 says that the â€Å"product†¦ is made available on the condition that it is not to be used as an abortifacient. † But how can the government assure that the user will not use it as abortifacient? 29 iii. Post-abortion care The Bill says it does not repeal the Penal Code on abortion. 30 It says, and I agree, that the abortionist mother should be given medical attention31 inasmuch as she is sick. But once she has recovered, she has to take responsibility for her action: murder of the most innocent human being. True, the abortionist mother has suffered and will continue to suffer from many physical and psychological consequences of her abortion. But so is the rapist. He will be hounded throughout his life of the crime he committed. Why should the public be more â€Å"merciful† to the abortionist mother than to the rapist? The abortionist mother has committed a much graver crime than he. The rapist violated the dignity of his victim but he has not taken away her life. I am not trying to justify the rapist. I am just stating what should be obvious: that abortion is much graver than rape. Both the rapist and the abortionist mother should go to jail and pay for their crimes. 4. The Bill’s damaging effects on the family a. The big picture The Philippines does not have to implement the Bill in order to see its consequences. The widespread use of contraception in the U. S. shows its damaging effects on the family. With a high number of pre-marital sex32, there is also a high cohabitation rate. And as cohabitation increases, consequently, marriage decreases. But not only that: of the few who gets married, many end up getting divorced, marital infidelity (adultery) being one of the causes. There are many single mothers as a result of pre-marital sex and divorce. It is the woman who usually suffers. Where is equality, then? More and more children are born out of wedlock. b. Prevalence and use of contraception The number of women (aged 15-44) who engaged in sexual intercourse and who has used whatever method of contraceptive is 99. 1%. 33 c. Cohabitation and declining marriage In 2002, there were 5. 6 million women (aged 15-44) who are cohabiting. 4 In 1980, 16% of the total population aged 15-64 got married. In 2008, that number has fallen to 11%. 35 d. Single-parent household and children born out of wedlock In 2008, an alarming 30%36 of all households is single-parent household. That is to say, more than 1 in every 4 households is a single-parent household. Do we want this for the Philippines? In 2008, close to half (41%) of all the birt hs are born to unmarried women. In France, it is 53% and in Sweden 55%. 37 e. Multiple opposite-sex partners (=adultery) For the period 2006-2008, there were 46 million men (aged 15-44) who had more than one woman partner! Of this number, 13 million had 15 or more women partners in his lifetime! The corresponding numbers for women are 41 million and 5 million, respectively. 38 If teenagers were educated to have sex with different persons before they got married, why should they be faithful when they get married? f. Divorce rate Marital infidelity often leads to divorce. In 2010, there were 2,096,000 marriage and 872,000 divorce and annulments. The average rate for 10 years is 40%. That is to say, almost half of the marriages end up in divorce and annulments! 39 Socio-political problems of the RH Principle of subsidiarity One basic principle in political government is subsidiarity. â€Å"This tenet holds that nothing should be done by a larger and more complex organization which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organization. †40 Since the Bill does not use the population-control-to-eradicate-poverty justification, there is no reason why the State should enter a person’s private life. â€Å"Satisfying sex life†41 has nothing to do whatsoever with the State inasmuch as it has nothing to do with one’s choice of career. Leave that to the person and to the family. Why should the State influence and condition one to be promiscuous? Spend tax on real needs The State should concern itself on real public needs. The classic doctrine on tax is that it cannot be imposed unless there is a real public need. This necessity can be (1) absolute (hospitals, schools, etc. ), (2) merely useful (weather forecasting service, etc. ) and (3) neither strictly necessary nor useful but are helpful toward the spiritual and cultural welfare (museums, etc. ). 42 Obviously, public money should be spent in that order: it is first spent on what is absolutely necessary. Only when there is excess money (which is not the case of the Philippines) can public money be spent on the second group. And only when there is still excess money can it be spent on the third group. Or better yet, let that excess money be returned to the poor taxpayers. The RH – which will cost P13. 7 billion43 for a â€Å"satisfying sex life†44– neither enters the first group nor any of the 3 groups. It even harms public morality (just like pornography and prostitution). The government has a very tight budget. If it approves the Bill, it should be very transparent and show which medical budget will be affected, which medicines (antibiotics, etc. ), which medical expenses (hospital beds, etc. will not be bought because the money is being re-allocated to the RH. The Filipino nation should be informed completely and thoroughly about the cost of the RH ideology. Western Imperialism The RH imperialism was clearly shown in the Manila Summit held in PICC last 15-XI-2012. It was a consequence of the London Summit45 held last 11-VII-2012. The â€Å"conspiracy theory† that Tatad ment ions46 is not a theory but a fact47. The conspirators themselves do not hide it! Hillary Clinton has repeatedly said that she is committed to promote reproductive health (which includes abortion). 8 It is not only the pro-RH legislators who are lending their services (for free? ), but also some media personalities. Elisa Sangalang reported that some known media personalities underwent training in order to sell the RH ideology. 49 Conclusion I hope the Philippines will not succumb to the RH ideological pressure as she did not succumb to communism (when so many countries did). President Manual Quezon once said, â€Å"I would rather have a Philippines run like hell by Filipinos than a Philippines run like heaven by the Americans†. My email: [emailprotected] com. Permission is granted to reproduce this article. Rh Bills Implication Essay Example Rh Bills Implication Essay RH Bill Will Destroy the Filipino Family Posted on 19 December 2012 by Truthsayer 1 By Dennis Yu1 1. Dissecting the RH Bill a. The problem being addressed by the Bill The latest version of the RH Bill2 does not refer to any specific problem related to demography. It does not mention at all the typical justification of population-control-to-eradicate-poverty. This version3 refers to reproductive health per se. The Philippines, according to this Bill, needs a law on reproductive health. By implication, it says that the Philippines does not have any law that addresses the reproductive health needs, an implication that is incorrect since there are already laws that address many of the provisions of the Bill. 4 The Bill seeks to address the reproductive rights of everyone. In Section 2, it affirms that there is such a thing as reproductive right and that such right is part of the human rights. It cites the international agreements where the Philippines is a signatory implying that the Philippines has to comply with its promises. What is not written in the Bill, though, is that the Philippines signed these agreements as the condition for receiving loans from international financial institutions. 5 Paradoxically, however, the current head of International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, says that the â€Å"Philippines is in the enviable position of having a young population and a fast-growing work force, whereas most advanced countries and even some emerging markets in Asia have populations that are aging rapidly. †6 b. The objective of the Bill The main objective of the Bill is to give everyone of his/her reproductive rights. We will write a custom essay sample on Rh Bills Implication specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Rh Bills Implication specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Rh Bills Implication specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In its words, it gives the Filipinos a â€Å"safe and satisfying sex life†7 and the â€Å"possibility of having pleasurable and safe sexual experiences. †8 c. The means to be employed There are basically two means to achieve this objective: distribution of contraceptives and sex education. Put another way: educating the people how to use contraceptives. This may sound too simplistic, but at the end of the day, that is what the Bill is trying to do. 2. Internal contradictions of the Bill The bill looks harmless and seems pro-women. But a careful reading of the bill brings several internal contradictions which include the bill’s sections related to the prevention of teen pregnancies, the right to life of the unborn and post-abortion care. I will be commenting these three areas as I go through the next three sections of the paper: the damaging effects of the bill on (1) the person and (2) on the family, and the (3) role of the State. 3. The Bill’s damaging effects on the person a. Contraception i. The health risks of contraception The pharmaceutical companies emphasize the benefits of their product and hide the negative effects. The Bill speaks of punishing any healthcare personnel who withholds information on the RH. 9 But does the Bill require aggressive and complete transparency as regards the negative effects of contraceptives? The user should know the possible abortive effect of some contraceptives: that she is possibly killing her own child. There should be a warning in big bold letters just like the health warning in the cigarettes: SMOKING KILLS. To cite just one of the many health risks: â€Å"Oral contraceptive use gt; 1 year was associated with a 2. -fold increased risk for triple-negative breast cancer†. 10 ii. Contraceptive mentality For the purposes of this paper, it is sufficient to look at Singapore (which has one of the lowest fertility rate in the world at 0. 78). Singapore has been giving incentives for some decades now for couples to have more babies. Lee Kwan Yew, who was the author of the population control in Singapore, said that â€Å"in the future we will have to depend on im migrants to make up our numbers, for without them Singapore will face the prospect of a shrinking workforce and a stagnant economy. 11 In an interview with a business leader, he said that the Philippines has to worry about the below-replacement fertility rate12 when it eventually comes in a few decades or so. For now, according to him, the more urgent problem is to reduce the population growth. In Singapore, the fertility rate dropped steadily until it reached 2. 1 in the 1970s. But it did not stop at 2. 1. Here is summary of Singapore’s fertility rate13: It seems irreversible according to Singapore’s experience. It took them a short time to â€Å"brainwash† the people for the fertility rate to fall. It is now taking them longer, if at all, to re-educate the people about all the advantages (economic, social and psychological/emotional) of having a large family. iii. Promiscuity What, in fact, the RH does, in the U. S. experience, is to make the girls promiscuous. Take note that the RH does not limit the contraceptives to married people. They are to be given to everyone. When you give contraceptives, the message is clear: have a â€Å"satisfying sex life†14. You can have a â€Å"safe sex†. But that is a false promise! The statistics on abortion show that contraceptives fail, and fail a lot! Its failure has killed millions of human beings, some 1. million in 2007 in the U. S. 15 I do not know if the Filipino mothers have understood clearly that RH brings with it â€Å"casual sex† for their daughters. In the U. S. , for the period 2006-2010, 4. 4 million female teenagers engaged in pre-marital sex. 16 I don’t know if the Filipino mothers can think beyond the short-sightedness of the pro-RH people. This evil ideology should not be imposed on the Filipino nation. iv. Teen pregnancies The Bill wants the Filipinos to have a â€Å"satisfying sex life†17 and at the same time it intends to prevent teen pregnancies. 18 One has to be completely blind not to realize the contradiction of these two terms. Sex education will teach the teenagers on the pleasures of sex and expect him/her to control his/her urges at the same time. Why does the MTRCB19 require â€Å"Parental Guidance† in watching some movies? Why does the State grant the right of suffrage only to those 18 and above? Why are minors not allowed to enter into any legal contract or own guns? It seems there is a difference between an adult and a minor! The minors do not have yet sufficient capacity to make serious decisions. And yet they are given â€Å"reproductive right†! They can decide to have or not to have another human being, and yet they cannot vote in the elections! True, it is nature that endowed them their biological capacity to reproduce. But it is also true that they were given hands and the capacity to kill other people at any age. When my friend was 7, he almost pulled the trigger of the revolver of his dad thinking that it was a toy gun. And we say: his dad should have been more careful with his gun, right? Similarly, should we not be more careful in teaching the teenagers about sex? The RH will not prevent teen pregnancies. Using contraceptives is not that easy. There are so many steps to follow to be able to use them successfully. The chances of pregnancy, therefore, are very high. In the U. S. , in 2002, there were 10 million women who said that they got pregnant when they were teenagers (aged 15-19). 20 b. Abortion i. Abortion is part of the contraceptive mentality Due to the contraceptive mentality, pregnancy (= baby) is seen as a disease that has to be avoided at all cost. Contraceptives, according to the Bill, are to be treated as essential medicine21 to cure the â€Å"sickness† of pregnancy. The next step, then, is abortion. To the contraceptive peddlers who say that contraceptive has nothing to do with abortion, and, in fact, is meant to reduce abortion, the statistical data of the Western countries belie their claims. In Spain there were 112,138 abortions in 2007. Here is the summary of abortions in Spain from 1992-200722: Abortions have doubled in the last 10 years. Where is the efficiency of contraceptives in reducing abortions? Where is the sex education that will teach the girls to prevent pregnancy? ii. Right to life of the unborn The Bill repeatedly â€Å"protects† the life of the unborn by affirming that abortifacient23 is illegal, that the penal code on abortion is not repealed24, that the mother and the unborn have equal rights25. It prohibits postcoital pills and emergency contraceptive pills. 6 But at the same time, it includes specifically the use of intra-uterine device (IUD)27, a device that prevents implantation and hence abortifacient. It also includes hormonal contraceptives that are at the same time abortifacient. As contraceptive, it inhibits the ovulation. As abortifacient (meaning, when the contraceptive function fails, the â€Å"back up† is abortive), it inhibit s the implantation of the fertilized ovum. 28 It seems that in the Senate debate last 19-XI-212, the senators refused to agree when life begins so as not to exclude IUD. They even put it on vote as if truths can be defined by popular democracy! Even if they were to unanimously vote affirming that â€Å"Rizal never existed†, that will not change the fact that Rizal did exist. ) Worse, the Bill implicitly acknowledges that, indeed, some contraceptives have abortive effects. Sec. 9 says that the â€Å"product†¦ is made available on the condition that it is not to be used as an abortifacient. † But how can the government assure that the user will not use it as abortifacient? 29 iii. Post-abortion care The Bill says it does not repeal the Penal Code on abortion. 30 It says, and I agree, that the abortionist mother should be given medical attention31 inasmuch as she is sick. But once she has recovered, she has to take responsibility for her action: murder of the most innocent human being. True, the abortionist mother has suffered and will continue to suffer from many physical and psychological consequences of her abortion. But so is the rapist. He will be hounded throughout his life of the crime he committed. Why should the public be more â€Å"merciful† to the abortionist mother than to the rapist? The abortionist mother has committed a much graver crime than he. The rapist violated the dignity of his victim but he has not taken away her life. I am not trying to justify the rapist. I am just stating what should be obvious: that abortion is much graver than rape. Both the rapist and the abortionist mother should go to jail and pay for their crimes. 4. The Bill’s damaging effects on the family a. The big picture The Philippines does not have to implement the Bill in order to see its consequences. The widespread use of contraception in the U. S. shows its damaging effects on the family. With a high number of pre-marital sex32, there is also a high cohabitation rate. And as cohabitation increases, consequently, marriage decreases. But not only that: of the few who gets married, many end up getting divorced, marital infidelity (adultery) being one of the causes. There are many single mothers as a result of pre-marital sex and divorce. It is the woman who usually suffers. Where is equality, then? More and more children are born out of wedlock. b. Prevalence and use of contraception The number of women (aged 15-44) who engaged in sexual intercourse and who has used whatever method of contraceptive is 99. 1%. 33 c. Cohabitation and declining marriage In 2002, there were 5. 6 million women (aged 15-44) who are cohabiting. 4 In 1980, 16% of the total population aged 15-64 got married. In 2008, that number has fallen to 11%. 35 d. Single-parent household and children born out of wedlock In 2008, an alarming 30%36 of all households is single-parent household. That is to say, more than 1 in every 4 households is a single-parent household. Do we want this for the Philippines? In 2008, close to half (41%) of all the birt hs are born to unmarried women. In France, it is 53% and in Sweden 55%. 37 e. Multiple opposite-sex partners (=adultery) For the period 2006-2008, there were 46 million men (aged 15-44) who had more than one woman partner! Of this number, 13 million had 15 or more women partners in his lifetime! The corresponding numbers for women are 41 million and 5 million, respectively. 38 If teenagers were educated to have sex with different persons before they got married, why should they be faithful when they get married? f. Divorce rate Marital infidelity often leads to divorce. In 2010, there were 2,096,000 marriage and 872,000 divorce and annulments. The average rate for 10 years is 40%. That is to say, almost half of the marriages end up in divorce and annulments! 39 Socio-political problems of the RH Principle of subsidiarity One basic principle in political government is subsidiarity. â€Å"This tenet holds that nothing should be done by a larger and more complex organization which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organization. †40 Since the Bill does not use the population-control-to-eradicate-poverty justification, there is no reason why the State should enter a person’s private life. â€Å"Satisfying sex life†41 has nothing to do whatsoever with the State inasmuch as it has nothing to do with one’s choice of career. Leave that to the person and to the family. Why should the State influence and condition one to be promiscuous? Spend tax on real needs The State should concern itself on real public needs. The classic doctrine on tax is that it cannot be imposed unless there is a real public need. This necessity can be (1) absolute (hospitals, schools, etc. ), (2) merely useful (weather forecasting service, etc. ) and (3) neither strictly necessary nor useful but are helpful toward the spiritual and cultural welfare (museums, etc. ). 42 Obviously, public money should be spent in that order: it is first spent on what is absolutely necessary. Only when there is excess money (which is not the case of the Philippines) can public money be spent on the second group. And only when there is still excess money can it be spent on the third group. Or better yet, let that excess money be returned to the poor taxpayers. The RH – which will cost P13. 7 billion43 for a â€Å"satisfying sex life†44– neither enters the first group nor any of the 3 groups. It even harms public morality (just like pornography and prostitution). The government has a very tight budget. If it approves the Bill, it should be very transparent and show which medical budget will be affected, which medicines (antibiotics, etc. ), which medical expenses (hospital beds, etc. will not be bought because the money is being re-allocated to the RH. The Filipino nation should be informed completely and thoroughly about the cost of the RH ideology. Western Imperialism The RH imperialism was clearly shown in the Manila Summit held in PICC last 15-XI-2012. It was a consequence of the London Summit45 held last 11-VII-2012. The â€Å"conspiracy theory† that Tatad ment ions46 is not a theory but a fact47. The conspirators themselves do not hide it! Hillary Clinton has repeatedly said that she is committed to promote reproductive health (which includes abortion). 8 It is not only the pro-RH legislators who are lending their services (for free? ), but also some media personalities. Elisa Sangalang reported that some known media personalities underwent training in order to sell the RH ideology. 49 Conclusion I hope the Philippines will not succumb to the RH ideological pressure as she did not succumb to communism (when so many countries did). President Manual Quezon once said, â€Å"I would rather have a Philippines run like hell by Filipinos than a Philippines run like heaven by the Americans†. My email: [emailprotected] com. Permission is granted to reproduce this article.